-
Website
http://www.thekmiecs.com/ -
Original page
http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing-advertising/blogging-vs-tweeting-content-quality/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
Personally I think my ratio of useful:useless has improved somewhat (my posts on Motrin, the big 3 automakers); that said I've been doing a lot of "linkety-link" myself i.e. just providing summaries of key posts, articles, reports, insights etc.
I'm not sure it's a good thing though....blogging is still the most valuable way b2b tool out there and many of the reasons why the list you mentioned established themselves in the space are still very much in play. That said, it certainly has become an uber-cluttered marketplace.
Tweeting, on the other hand, is just easy...and by easy, I mean QUICK.
So is one necessarily better than the other? Not at all, but by the time I've taken to write this comment, I could have tweeted twenty times about the sublime, the ridiculous and maybe....just maybe, one gem :)
When Twitter Grader came out I was genuinely excited. The concept of being able ot score tweeters seemed like a logical next step, but it also provided a mechanism for helping newbies sift between signal and noise. As I wrote here, I still believe that a simple thumbs up/thumbs down button for each tweet would be a simple yet effective method of keeping people honest.
http://www.thekmiecs.com/marketing/twitter-grad...
Looking forward to reading more great thoughts on your site and via twitter.
The responsibility piece is key and it works both ways. I often read this blog http://gobigalways.com/ a few months back the blogger stopped posting all together. I went from irritated by the lack of content to genuinely concerned. When finally he emerged, he bared his soul to apologize for the lack of content and explain that he was getting a divorce. Ouch.
I instantly felt "small." For a few weeks I had contemplated removing him from my iGoogle feed because of his lack of comittment to his readers. To find out the personal situation and the reason for lack of blogging, well I felt crappy. It's made me rethink alot of things.
Keep the good content flowing, regardless of how often it comes, and I'll keep reading.
Interesting observation. Some might agree and others disagree. But Twitter may not be a sole factor. Many of us have gotten spread thin through commitments and travel that it's hard to keep up frequency. As for quality, I'm still blogging for myself as much as the community, so one of the ways I measure quality is through the visual thinking I've done. I've had some really good ones over the last year.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7855449@N02/sets/7...
Thanks for a post like this though as it's a reminder that people are watching and they go where the value is.
I've enjoyed your visual expression feed on Flickr. You do a great job of sharing. As I look at blogging vs. tweeting one of the prime reasons I think we need to reinvigorate blogging is that blogs are now trusted/approved sources of data to reference. I've often pointed to posts from you, Kevin Rose, Avinash, etc. and been able to use them as reference points with clients. Tweets, because our how niche twitter still is, are much more difficult to justify as a credible source of information. That will change over time.
This doesn't mean they aren't providing value. For some of my favorite bloggers, this is like MJ going form a 36 point per game scorer to a 32 point per game scorer. In scoring less he rebounded more and played better defense. If you will he became a better all around contributor.
The same could be said for all the people I referenced. Matt Dickman provides a tremendous amount of value on twitter and his blog. I learned about the umbrella site via his blog. His contribution on understanding Facebook's audience was amazing. The writing of that guide took far more time than the actual blog post. The quality came in the work he compiled, not the post itself. Well for me it did.
I am so in to Twitter at the moment as a way of learning how to develop a community. But tomorrow, it could be that I am back to Delicious and FriendFeed. I don't feel guilt about this at all!
From the other end, as long as those I follow continue to deliver their thoughts and ideas via whatever means - blogs or Twitter - then I feel content. If one of them is less good for a period, that is just fine with me.
As for Peter Kim. I have been collaborating with him over his list of companies using social media to market themselves. Both our blogs and Twitters have been crucial to that process. So social media is not just about thought-leadership. It is also about interaction whatever the medium.
So, Adam, I admire your posting enormously. I just think there are positives as well as negatives in the situation you describe.
As previously noted. I think Peter is great. I subscribe to his feed. I read his blog. I follow him on twitter. I find him to be a great resource.
While on the whole, social media is not about thought leadership, do not people like Jason Calacanis, Scoble, etc. have a responsibility as so-called thought-leaders to provide, well thought-leadership? I'm legitimately asking the question. I get more out of David's, Matt's, Peters, and Joseph's tweets than I do out of Jason's, Pistachio's, or Scoble's. I'm actually really disappointed with their offerings. But, for every 115 tweets Jason offers about Mahalo, he then provides one great link...it's what keeps me following him.
I hope my post didn't come across as being critical of the contributions of people like Peter. Totally not my goal. If it did, my apologies. I was really trying to explain the correlation between the rise of twitter and the frequency and quality of blog posts.